Misguided Anti-Internet Technology Ideas

The A.I.R.K.S.  (Apple IR Kill Switch)
Apple files a patent to prevent concert fans from recording the musicians they love and support. According to Wired, this would allow concert owners to; “use the camera to capture a second image that includes an infrared signal with encoded data. The phone would then ascertain whether that encoded data contains a disable command, and, if necessary, “disable a record function”, or perhaps introduce a compulsory watermark. That would allow concert owners to stop people recording videos of bands, for example, introducing the equivalent of DRM for live music, preventing it from being copied.”  Source: Wired Read more.
There is no better way to guarantee that less people will know about your band than to limit the 21st century equivalent to word of mouth. Your content may be protected but your fan’s ability to tell others about how awesome your music is will be effectively nullified and your music will fade from the collective cultural memory.

The  S-978 EVFL  (Embedding Video Felony Law)
United States Senators Amy Klobuchar, John Cornyn and Christopher Coons have proposed a law that would make streaming copyrighted material a felony offence. You can read the full text of the bill here. According to Tech Dirt ” If you embed a YouTube video that turns out to be infringing, and more than 10 people view it because of your link… you could be facing five years in jail. This is, of course, ridiculous, and suggests (yet again) politicians who are regulating a technology they simply do not understand. Should it really be a criminal act to embed a YouTube video, even if you don’t know it was infringing? This could create a massive chilling effect to the very useful service YouTube provides in letting people embed videos.” Source:  Tech Dirt. Read more
Embedded links is everything on the internet, here we have yet another example of laws and lawmakers that don’t use technology, don’t understand technology yet propose absurd laws that impact internet technology at its very core.

The ABX-128 LAW  (Internet Sales Tax Law)
Here in the US many of our states are in economic trouble, it’s a long story … the way that many states have decided to deal with the problem is to charge sales tax on online retailers like Amazon.com. As a result small businesses and affiliates here in the state of California will get cut off. According to Technorati: ” The proposed bill, ABX1 28, seeks to collect sales tax for goods purchased online by extending the online seller’s “nexus” to include affiliate marketers who drive traffic to the seller’s site. Unfortunately, the net effect of the bill would not be to increase tax revenues, but to drive affiliate marketers out of state rather than to jeopardize their ties with retailers like Amazon, who most likely would sever ties with them rather than be forced to collect sales tax.” Source: Technorati
So if you are a small business in the state of California,  your sales could be negatively impacted if in fact Amazon decides to drop support for affiliate marketers and small businesses there by reducing the total amount of business taking place in the state along with the economic activity that comes with it. Great way to support a struggling economy California…good job.